Why does the State have Authority to Kill Civilian Citizens?
Two things happened this week that may have caught your attention. Virginia killed off that DC Sniper who terrorized citizens of Virginia, Md and the District by literally taking potshots from his car at random people just pumping gas or being in the wrong place. Secondly, Ohio tried to lethally inject someone but after multiple attempts at jabbing to unsuccessfully find his vein had to reprieve and try later- at which point Ohio determined that they would not go for the three shot "cocktail" but use one "more humane" shot to knock someone off. This is reported on page A10 of today's NYT.
No hue and cry except from a few veiled weeping spiritual widows of Muhammad the Sniper was heard castigating the injustices of the death penalty--- because a large number of people think if anyone deserved it-this guy did.
But that goes to the heart of the question- does anyone deserve it- and if anyone does, does the State have the right to inflict it. Do they have jurisdiction to take a life, even a really bad one?
The 8th Amendment to the US Constitution prohibits government from inflicting "cruel or unusual punishment." Gone are the racks, the thumb screws, the stockades, public floggings, etc. But not gone are jabbing with needles for lethal injections that kill off a prisoner, electrocution while strapped to a frying chair and in some cases, even facing a firing squad.
Is Death more or less "cruel" than thumb screws? Is death more or less "cruel" than public flogging? Is it more or less "unusual" to strap someone with thick leather straps to a frying chair and shoot electric charges through them until their hair singes and their nerves fry-to death.
This question is long settled for the bulk of the rest of the civilized world.
How civilized are we really?
I submit that a discussion over whether a three cocktail series of injections to first paralyze someone before killing them or just one that is used for euthanizing animals to death is more "humane" is such an oxymoronic question that it ranks among the most absurd ever debated in public policy.
Former UK ambassador says CIA sent people to be ‘raped with broken bottles’
Stumble This!
The CIA relied on intelligence based on torture in prisons in Uzbekistan, a place where widespread torture practices include raping suspects with broken bottles and boiling them alive, says a former British ambassador to the central Asian country.
Craig Murray, the rector of the University of Dundee in Scotland and until 2004 the UK's ambassador to Uzbekistan, said the CIA not only relied on confessions gleaned through extreme torture, it sent terror war suspects to Uzbekistan as part of its extraordinary rendition program.
"I'm talking of people being raped with broken bottles," he said at a lecture late last month that was re-broadcast by the Real News Network. "I'm talking of people having their children tortured in front of them until they sign a confession. I'm talking of people being boiled alive. And the intelligence from these torture sessions was being received by the CIA, and was being passed on."
Human rights groups have long been raising the alarm about the legal system in Uzbekistan. In 2007, Human Rights Watch declared that torture is "endemic" to the country's justice system.
Murray said he only realized after his stint as ambassador that the CIA was sending people to be tortured in Uzbekistan, country he describes as a "totalitarian" state that has never moved on from its communist era, when it was a part of the Soviet Union.
Story continues below...
Suspects in Uzbekistan's gulags "were being told to confess to membership in Al Qaeda. They were told to confess they'd been in training camps in Afghanistan. They were told to confess they had met Osama bin Laden in person. And the CIA intelligence constantly echoed these themes."
"I was absolutely stunned -- it changed my whole world view in an instant -- to be told that London knew [the intelligence] coming from torture, that it was not illegal because our legal advisers had decided that under the United Nations convention against torture, it is not illegal to obtain or use intelligence gained from torture as long as we didn't do the torture ourselves," Murray said.
IT'S THE PIPELINE, STUPID
Murray asserts that the primary motivation for US and British military involvement in central Asia has to do with large natural gas deposits in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. As evidence, he points to the plans to build a natural gas pipeline through Afghanistan that would allow Western oil companies to avoid Russia and Iran when transporting natural gas out of the region.
Murray alleged that in the late 1990s the Uzbek ambassador to the US met with then-Texas Governor George W. Bush to discuss a pipeline for the region, and out of that meeting came agreements that would see Texas-based Enron gain the rights to Uzbekistan's natural gas deposits, while oil company Unocal worked on developing the Trans-Afghanistan pipeline.
"The consultant who was organizing this for Unocal was a certain Mr. Karzai, who is now president of Afghanistan," Murray noted.
Murray said part of the motive in hyping up the threat of Islamic terrorism in Uzbekistan through forced confessions was to ensure the country remained on-side in the war on terror, so that the pipeline could be built.
"There are designs of this pipeline, and if you look at the deployment of US forces in Afghanistan, as against other NATO country forces in Afghanistan, you'll see that undoubtedly the US forces are positioned to guard the pipeline route. It's what it's about. It's about money, it's about oil, it's not about democracy."
The Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline is slated to be completed in 2014, with $7.6 billion in funding from the Asian Development Bank.
Murray was dismissed from his position as ambassador in 2004, following his first public allegations that the British government relied on torture in Uzbekistan for intelligence.
The following videos were posted to YouTube by the Real News Network on Oct. 26 and Nov. 4, 2009.
Story comments are below...
Posts
Showing 20 of 75 Comments
Reactions